"Bessie asked if I would have a book: the word book acted as a
transient stimulus, and I begged her to fetch Gulliver’s
Travels from the library. This book I had again
and again perused with delight."
Within the space of the novel,
books serve as an alternate universe for Jane Eyre. They have the power to
transport her to a world where her imagination is allowed to soar; a stark
contrast to the physical and emotional constraints she experiences at
Gateshead. HOWEVER, nothing in this novel is THAT simple. Charlotte Bronte embarks on a kind of 'political project' with her carefully thought-out references to literary texts
in ‘Jane Eyre’; each book serves a purpose much broader than being Jane’s “enshrinement”.
National reform, new English values and functionality of the Empire are subtly
integrated into Jane’s childhood through her innocent interest in British birds
and Gulliver’s voyages. Not only does this make ‘Jane Eyre’ an incredibly complex
novel in terms of its relationship with the nation, it also underscores how
Bronte ingeniously uses references to other literary texts to raise questions
that could not be stated explicitly.

WHAT’S KEY HERE is the way ‘Gulliver’s
Travels’ becomes prophetic – the unexplored territories of “Lilliput and
Brobdingnag” for him become Lowood, Thornfield and Ferndean for Jane, drawing
attention to the way she will similarly embark on an emotional, spiritual and
physical journey into the unknown. Gulliver’s attempts to assimilate himself
within the world of these new regions is analogous to Jane’s endeavors, and
both characters receive their fair share of mistreatment through the course of
their expeditions. However, Gulliver HAS to end up in
England after bitterly realizing it serves as a better home than the outside
world ever could, and this is Bronte’s way of highlighting how the entity represented
by Jane Eyre MUST find a space within the confines of England (which is why she couldn't be allowed to go to India with St. John later).
She must be a
willing member of the national discourse, and this is where it’s significant to
note WHY the novel loses its charm for Jane. After speaking out against John Reed, Jane subverts
all kinds of Victorian ideals of femininity, and can be seen as betraying the
nation’s value system through her lack of control over her passions and
language. While the ‘red-room’ attempts to forcibly tame and lock away this
wild female force, her complete alliance with the nation cannot be achieved
until she consciously accepts her responsibility as a citizen, and the course
of the novel offers way for her to integrate herself within the national
dominion. This is why the “charm” of the “cherished volume” now becomes “eerie
and dreary”, simultaneously transforming Gulliver from a heroic adventurer to a
“desolate wanderer”, and disillusioning Jane enough to dare “no longer persue”
the volume till she formally acknowledges her identity within the functionality
of the Empire.
I wish there was a 'like' button on this post! Great take on Jane Eyre, nothing is what it seems. I share your views on Jane as an ambiguous character, wanting to be part of 'Britishness' yet always on the boundaries, provoking with her subtexts... I have a blog: Rereading Jane Eyre where I have articles about this inspiring novel (and a few other odds and ends, too!")
ReplyDeletehttp://lucciagray.wordpress.com/category/all-about-jane-eyre/
I'm currently preparing an article on 'Books Jane Eyre Read' and, of course, Gulliver's Travels is top of my list!